On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:30:27AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> Hi
> 
> How do I figure out who is the maintainer of Spamassassin? I put
> "How to figure out who is a maintainer of an openbsd package" into google
> and got to http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html
> Where they write:
> "To see who is the maintainer of the port, type, for example:
> $ cd /usr/ports/archivers/unzip
> $ make show=MAINTAINER"
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /usr/ports 
> bash: cd: /usr/ports: No such file or directory

You've already been pointed to pkg_info; in this case, it's
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> My OpenBSD is 3.9 installed from packages.
> When I run sa-learn, Perl segfaults after some time and leaves a stale lock.
> Seems in some database library:
> 
> #0  0x05cce49a in hash_access (hashp=0x87dcb000, action=HASH_GET, 
>     key=0xcfbea700, val=0xcfbea6f8) at /usr/src/lib/libc/db/hash/hash.c:624
>         rbufp = (BUFHEAD *) 0x89cfb700
>         bufp = (BUFHEAD *) 0x2
>         save_bufp = (BUFHEAD *) 0x89cfb700
>         bp = (u_int16_t *) 0x86b0a1fe
>         n = 670
>         ndx = 255
>         off = -2121377408
>         size = 53
>         kp = 0x818e5980 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>         pageno = 563
> #1  0x0b49cb0c in XS_DB_File_FETCH ()
>    from /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/OpenBSD.i386-openbsd/auto/DB_File/DB_File.so
> No symbol table info available.
> #2  0x1c064c4e in Perl_pp_entersub ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #3  0x1c05eac4 in Perl_runops_standard ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #4  0x1c0188e6 in S_call_body ()
> No symbol table info available.
> #5  0x1c01882f in Perl_call_sv ()
> No symbol table info available.
> 
> When I clear the stale lock and re-run it, then it segfaults again.  Are you
> familiar with this problem?

No, it's not supposed to happen. And quite a few people use it without
issues.

> I will try yet erasing the .spamassassin directory
> (no idea how to erase the db without corrupting the contents of .spamassassin)
> and then retrain. What I also don't like is that SA is very slow. I don't
> believe Bayesian statistics are so computationally expensive.
> 
> Can you recommend a different tool than spamassassin? I wonder what CRM114 is
> http://crm114.sourceforge.net/

dspam is supposed to be a better Bayesian filtering tool than SA. A
nontrivial percentage of SA's time is spent doing stuff other than
Bayesian filtering, though - various network checks, and static filter
rules.

                Joachim

Reply via email to