Pierre-Yves Ritschard schrieb:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:34:51 +0100
Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could also do an ugly hack which would consist of attaching a
second network on your servers and load balancers (provided they are in
the same (v)?lan) like 172.16.1.0/24 and use that for contacting the
real, then you'll need to lookup another routing table when being
contacted on the 172.16.1.0/24 network (using pf + alternate routing
tables in openbsd or iproute2 in linux). Otherwise you're stuck with
nat.
Nah, can't do that... It looks like I'm stuck with NAT.
And therefor stuck with the load balancers IP address in my access.log,
right?
too bad...
./Marian
