I have 4 machines running OpenBSD-stable and it used some AS in the 64512-65535 range. Now, two of these machines will be eventually connected to two different AS, say obsd1 to AS 64512 and obsd2 to 64513, while these four machines fall under one AS, say 64513.
>From my readings in the published article of Claudio Jekker, it appears to me >that this setup is for a fully-redundant architecture wherein there could be no single point of failure. I want to experiment with creating dummy interfaces under such topology just like in Quagga. > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-07 13:11]: >> Does that categorically mean there is no way, as of the moment, in openbgp >> to use a dummy >> interface just like in Quagga? > > well, you have to be more explicity. > pseudo-interfaces are just interfaces. there is no visible difference > for bgpd. > > you still didn't say what you actually want. > > -- > Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > BS Web Services, http://bsws.de > Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services > Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
