Hi, On Friday, 16. March 2007 23:41, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote: ... > Um, no. If you apply the errata to -release you have -release + errata. > There are things in stable that are not in the errata, albeit not much. > Tracking -stable requires using cvs which, frankly is much easier than > patching -release, unless you're worried about the time spent doing a > cvs > update and possible extra compilation time.
You're right of course. I was assuming he was looking for the easiest way to get a -release version with patches applied. That's what I wanted to explain and obviously I got it confused with -stable. regards, Tobias W.
