On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, RedShift wrote:
> Siju George wrote:
>> http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
>> Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
>
> IMHO it's not a fair comparison, most linux distributions ship with alot
more
> software than microsoft windows does, and most bugreports indicate an issue
> with third-party software.
It's even more bullshit than that.
Among other things, it compares the number of 'patches', which for non-MS
systems tend to be 1:1 or close to it whereas MS has be making a point of
rolling as many vulnerabilities into a single patch as possible.
The metrics are not described. Terms like 'patch', 'vulnerability',
'advisory' are intermingled in a most unclear manner. Patch 'development
time' seems undefined as well.
Symantic makes its living selling paper bailing cups in a leaky boat.
The media actively participates in obfuscating the issues, the causes and
the solutions by publicizing such crap from Symantic and MS.
-Lars
Lars NoodC)n ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Ensure access to your data now and in the future
http://opendocumentfellowship.org/about_us/contribute
