I have both ath and ral, ral is almost alway lower strength but better supported.
ath is better strength but it is buggy at best in g mode. Sam Fourman Jr. On 4/4/07, Obiozor Okeke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, good choice. I've had great success with ral(4) supported wireless pci and pcmcia cards i.e. from edimax ew-7608pg/7628ig (cheap cards i know but it works for what i need!) Vincent GROSS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/4/07, Marius ROMAN wrote: > ral(4) because it's better supported. > > On 4/4/07, Nick ! wrote: > > On 4/4/07, Vincent GROSS wrote: > > > > > > > > 1) what is the R.E. level of ath(4) ? fully understood, mainly understood ? > > > > > > 2) Is Atheros still reluctant to disclose documentation for its chips ? > > > > > > 3) If 1)=fully and 2)=reluctant, what should I pick between ath(4) and ral(4) ? > > > > ral(4). I have ath(4) because I got it from a big box store, but I'm > > ashamed. Don't support stupid vendors, give your money elsewhere. > > As you are conforting me in my final decision, let's go for ral(4). Thanks folks. -- Vincent GROSS --------------------------------- It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
