On 4/5/07, Steven Harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS
HANDLED. Get it?
The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30
seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and
embarrassment.
On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andris Delfino wrote:
> > > What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
> >
> > Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look
at
> > the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why?
> >
> >
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1573
> >
> > I don't think you did!
> >
> > He sure did a hell of a huge amount of work that was his, and original
> > for your own benefit, and the only mistakes he may have done was to try
> > to work on it faster then he may should have and wrongly include
> > temporary files to help in the process!
> >
> > Should he had finish his work in a later time and not try to make this
> > available sooner to us, then nothing would have been said on this.
> >
> > In any case a simple private email to him directly would have been the
> > decent human being things to do, but I guess you don't even get that do
you?
> >
> > Just like I said before.
> >
> > Where the hell is the open community is going these days, I have no
> > clue... Look to me it sure enjoy destroy itself for sure.
> >
> > I am lost for words!
> >
> >
>
> Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted
> software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted).
>
> Licenses are licenses.
>
>
He should realized that he couldn't do that... get it?
