On 21 Apr 2007, at 14:38, Henning Brauer wrote:

> * Ond??ej Sur?? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-21 14:58]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jon Morby pm9e v So 21. 04. 2007 v 12:13 +0100:
>>> Not sure if you're still trying to fix this, or if you're  
>>> sorted ....
>>> but if you're still having problems
>>>
>>> What does your filters section look like ?
>>
>> It's very simple now - none.  But filters just modify prefixes  
>> accepted
>> and not coupling.  I do receive IPv6 prefixes they are just not  
>> coupled
>> into kernel.
>
> i guess there is some bug.
> since i have no v6 here it is a bit hard to reproduce and fix
>

I must admit I'm starting to notice some weirdness .... mostly  
anecdotal at this stage, however it seems that

with "announce IPv4 none" but a "global" filter allowing export of v4  
prefixes we're still announcing / saying we have v4 addresses - we're  
finding some peers rejecting sessions from us when we have "announce  
all" and "allow to any community xxxx:yyyy"

I'm trying to throw enough hardware into a pool to be able to test  
this in more detail.  You're welcome to accounts on them if necessary  
for testing / etc if it will help ?


-- 
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/

Reply via email to