On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
> >I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
> >with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
>
> Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?
> Thanks for your response.
ccd is likely to be slightly faster, but it *will* eat your data. Just
stick with RAIDframe, or hardware RAID, or the upcoming softraid (like
RAIDframe, but newer and shinier; I presume it'll be announced on
undeadly.org one of these days). Worrying about ccd/RAIDframe memory
usage really isn't necessary; both don't use memory on a scale that you
will notice with that amount of memory in the box.
Joachim
--
TFMotD: named.conf (5) - configuration file for named
