On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:53:39PM +0700, sonjaya wrote:
> On 5/11/07, Lars D. Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 May 2007, Adam Hawes wrote:
> >> You're well advised to go do some reading on your own. If you had
> >> you would have discovered that OpenVPN ahs a tutorial page for
> >> configuring the server, as does the readily available PPTP server.
> >
> >It's not a funny joke to be recommending PPTP to anybody. Some may miss
> >the sarcasm and actually try to deploy it.
> >
> >Any further amount of reading (if done) would reveal that PPTP can't
> >really be called secure and should be avoided. Its successor, L2TP, can
> >be improved somewhat, at least the connections, by tunnelling over SSL.
> >But then why not cut out the middleman and use SSL to begin with? Fewer
> >parts that way.
> >
> >IPsec and SSL are your two options:
> > http://www.vpnc.org/vpn-standards.html
> >
> >I'm wondering that since IPsec is part fo IPv6, the equivalent to an
> >IPsec-on-IPv4 VPN could be made using IPv6 instead. Maybe that would be
> >smarter in the long run.
> so i must using ipsec for security reason , how about the client (
> such us Microsoft ) can they use ipsec too.
Yes, but don't use the stock IPsec client.
Really, the archives are full of this discussion. Please take a good
look there, first; if you encounter any problems, you are welcome to
ask, but *please* search the archive first.
Joachim
--
TFMotD: release (8) - building an OpenBSD release