Hi again, I didn't wan't to mean that there is no info, I was only making reference to my ignorance: I don't know if this pass rules were seted corrected or not.
I got the same basically, all pasted from ftp-proxy man page or openbsd "issues with pf and ftp" page. Maybe could it be for block all rules? Don't know what's happening, Thanks for all On 5/25/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Alberich de megres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > But i got this on my rc.local.conf yet.. Are the pass in and out > > rules for ftp and ftp-data ports right? > > your nat rule looks a bit strange, I have > > nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) static-port > > The ftp related rules I have are essentially pasted from the ftp-proxy > man page, yours differ somewhat. > > I have > > # [...] > nat-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" > rdr-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" > > # [...] > > rdr pass on $int_if proto tcp from $lan to any port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port > 8021 > > # [...] > anchor "ftp-proxy/*" > > pass out proto tcp from $proxy to any port ftp > > > I add them at my own risk.. none in openbsd ftp and pf issues page > > and google tell nothing about this. Any help? Thanks > > I don't want to appear rude, but there are the ftp-proxy man pages, > the PF faq and a certain tutorial out there at least. A bit odd if > you couln't find any info. > > Hope this helps, > -- > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ > http://www.nuug.no/ > "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" > delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
