Another issue that may be interesting: Is this a server-like PC where you can tweak the serial console usage from the BIOS?
I saw strange behaviour on a HP ProLiant DL145 G2 (I think) where for some configuration of the serial BIOS console, the login promp from OpenBSD on the serial port came and went depending on if I attached to the telnet-emulated-through-BIOS serial console through the Integrated Lights-Out ethernet connector. Bottom line. Are there interesting BIOS settings for serial console? On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:30:56AM -0400, Woodchuck wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2007, Maurice Janssen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to use a VT420 serial terminal on an i386 box running > > 4.1-stable. Not as a system console, just as an extra screen to login. > > The output of the boot loader and kernel output should go to the > > monitor, as usual. > > > > The terminal is hooked up to the first serial port with a null modem > > cable. I changed the tty00 line of /etc/ttys to: > > tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt220 on secure > > and sent -HUP to init. There's a getty process on tty00, but there's > > no login: prompt on the terminal. Everything I type on the terminal is > > echoed on the screen, so the cable is OK (local echo is off). > > HMMMM. Look into two things, no, make that three: > > 1) The settings on the terminal, whether XON/XOFF or RTS/CTS > synchronization is selected, also baud rate, parity, 8/7 bits. Try > 8 bits, No parity, 1 stop bit ("8N1"). > > 2) The settings on the tty, from # stty -a /dev/tty00 when > the getty is running. > > 3) There are null modem cables, and there are null modem > cables. Some are just plain junk, providing only cross over of the > two data pins and if you're lucky, a ground. Others implement > various ideas of what a null modem cable should be; the opinions > of what a null modem cable differed between Digital, who made your > terminal and IBM, who designed the PeeCee. > > > The funny thing is, when I start 'tip tty00' on the machine (while > > logged in at the keyboard+monitor), the login: prompt appears on the > > terminal. > > Yeah, this is weird. You should be able to get the login: prompt > by at most hitting the carriage return on the 420 twice. Try to > set up everything for XON/XOFF flow control. > > > When I quit tip, I can login at the terminal. When I logout from the > > terminal, the login: prompt doesn't appear (but everything I type is > > echoed to the terminal screen as before). I can start tip again, and > > then the login: prompt shows up again. > > > > I suspected a problem with the permissions of the tty00 device. After > > logout, they are set to > > crw------- 1 root wheel 8, 0 May 29 21:44 tty00 > > This, by default, should be uucp.dialer, permissions crw-rw---, > when "at rest". When a getty is running, it should be as shown here. > > > When logged in it is set to > > crw------- 1 maurice tty 8, 0 May 29 22:00 tty00 > > Not sure if this is what it should be, but it doesn't look strange to > > me. > > > > BTW: not sure if it is related, but when I login as normal user, the > > following warning is shown on the terminal: > > ksh: No controlling tty (open /dev/tty: Device busy) > > ksh: warning: won't have full job control > > When I login as root, I don't get this warning. > > Ick. I have my suspicions, but won't voice them since they are > superstitious. They involve a brief trip to single-user mode and > running cd /dev; sh MAKEDEV all. > > > Any ideas what's going wrong? > > Yeah, you're using a serial terminal on a PeeCee. (sarcasm). > > You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. The > lamp grows dimmer. (Zork, a metaphor for debugging RS-232). > > Install a terminal emulator on the box, like kermit or something > like minicom, from ports if the sometimes goofy behavior of tip/cu > annoys you (like killing its parent xterm when you give it ~.). > Hook up the terminal. See what you can do. Try things (settings). > Terminals are a PITA, as bad as serial printers. See if the 420 > has a VT-220 emulation mode, if so try it. It's hard to debug them > "over the phone" (by email) like this, one needs to poke and try. > A RS232 line analyzer is real handy. There used to be various > utilities for MS-DOS that would display line status of the com ports > on the screen, much like the blinkenlights on a modem. Don't know > it they exist for Unix. Could kermit have such a feature? One has > to delve into the kernel to see these things, a forbidden zone in > Unix, unless some happy ioctl to pccom exists. > > Helpful man pages: tty, tip, remote, cu, getty, gettytab, pccom > > With the getty killed, try catting a "large" text file to > /dev/tty00 (as root), look for garbage on the terminal, a sign > of flow control being wrong. Try this with the terminal set > for "smooth scrolling". > > A debugging test: use the same cable (if you can) and connect > the com ports of two OpenBSD boxes. Start the getty on one, and > use tip/cu/minicom/kermit on the other. Everything should work > fine. If it doesn't, the cable sucks in some way. If it doesn't > work, force XON/XOFF on both boxes. How you do this for getty is > a good question, settings in gettytab is the answer. > > Dave "I already have a headache, and it's not my problem!" -- / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB