On 6/12/07, Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/11/07, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/10/07, Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's just as stupid as requiring people have a cert. Lots of people have
> > certs because so many places toss your resume if you don't have "MCSE" or
> > "CCNA" listed on it. Just because they have a cert doesn't mean they don't
> > know what they're doing.
>
> alot of anti-cert sentiment. borderline misinformation in
> some cases. I've interviewed folks with and without certs.
> I don't know why some people insist on arguing
> that "book != cover"[1] with regard to certs. silly.
>
> here's a couple points for consideration:
You lightly touched on it, but there is a very crucial need for this
certification that happily employed IT people can't begin to
understand.
There are many young unemployables who freely code dozens of
languages, but work at gas stations because they have a blank resume.
I know a very good kernel hacker in Flint, MI who does roofing. I met
another C programmer at a small factory where we both made -less- than
minimum wage.
Does the cert cover coding?
In any case I completely ignore certs when hiring or finding
contractors. I've found too many times that people can't answer
simple questions about administration even when they're a CCNA or MCSE
or the like.
In the case of developers I'll take someone without experience if they
bring their own code and can explain it to me in layman's terms, and
if they can take some basic undocumented code of ours and document it.
Greg
--
http://ticketmastersucks.org/tracker.html
"Run over your friends in stolen Volkswagens
And tell them I sent you, and tell them I sent ... YOU" - Mclusky
