>> Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535) >> failed
>this almost sounds like you have something else which grabs these >ports. do you, intentionally? Well I can't find anything that could block it. There is no ftp daemon or ftp proxy or whatever running on the box. What does the pf do when it tries to allocate a nat port and doesn't succeed, doesn't it do the nat at all or does it try again? It could explain the behavior that we see that sometimes packets aren't natted as they should be. So then can I enlarge the range? Thanks, Andy. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/847 - Release Date: 12/06/2007 21:42 ______________________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager at : [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call +32-(0)11-240234. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by Sophos for the presence of computer viruses. ______________________________________________________________________
