On 2007/08/21 07:37, Juan Miscaro wrote: > --- John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i have just setted up a new natted firewall server after some period > > of inactivity. I got surprised with the new ftp-proxy utility! > > > > Now, it writes new pf rules, the prior one did not! I feel like > > unconfortable by the current ftp-proxy approach, since i cannot > > understand the rationale behind it. > > What I don't like about it is that I cannot insert a label in those > rules to track incoming and outgoing data.
in -current ftp-proxy can add tags, you can then pass the traffic using a rule that matches those tags (e.g. "tagged ftpproxy") and set a label on that pass rule.
