> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:08:02PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On 28/08/07, Craig Skinner - Sun Microsystems - Linlithgow - Scotland
> > > Yay! Action at last.
> > 
> > Wow! This is great news.
> 
> Better late than never, but damn is it late.

Indeed, that is the correct sentiment regarding Sun's action here.

The facts of the industry are simply this: Approximately 95% of
machine parts are documented (whether they are documented well or not
is a totally seperate question).

Starting roughly around 1990, Sun put themselves on the path of
supplying only the absolute minimum documentation for their machine
parts.  Meanwhile, the PC really took off, and all the documentation
for PC parts has always been out there (minus a few special cases that
we have had to fight for).  DEC released pretty much all the
documentation for the Alpha right from the start, and later a few
people pressured HP to release pretty much all the HPPA documentation.

That left the largest straggler in the industry: Sun.  And the case is
that Sun has always had the documentation in-house; because of solid
engineering principles in-house they document everything, perhaps
because their hardware and software groups are seperated so much.

Apple also has done a poor job of documenting their hardware, but
looking at the quality of their hardware (with entirely pointless
divergences between models that come out 3 months apart) we can guess
that maybe we don't want to see them.

Finally, there are a few American chip makers that resist the status
quo, like Marvell and (to a lesser degree) Broadcom.  Even Intel tries
to play the open game now.  Then there are a handful of (increasingly
irrelevant) American wireless chipset manufacturers.  But in general
there are fewer and fewer closed vendors.

But Sun had no excuse for this behaviour in 1990, and it is incredible
that only now they will try to redeem it.  So I don't say bravo, but I
say "about time".  They don't get any points from me, because they are
so late.

I give the most credit to Craig Skinner who started the conversation
at Sun with us (he found the right place to push Sun -- right at the
top), and David Gwynne for continuing the soft pressure through the
last couple of months.

My biggest hope is that Sun's cleanup process does not delete too much
information from the pages... like descriptions of hardware bugs and
the workarounds needed for "best effort" operation.  Because we
already know that some revisions of Sun hardware have brutally bad
bugs that ... even sometimes cannot be worked around.

Reply via email to