On 8/28/07, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Normally I wouldn't repeat undeadly stuff here on misc@, but I'm sure > many of you will want to know. > > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20070829001634 > > > And if you do this kind of thing, it's worth letting the rest of the > world in on this: > http://digg.com/linux_unix/Lnux_Driver_Violated_BSD_License
I am currently having a discussion about dual licensing, and am a bit confused. Is Reyk and others working on this drivers code dual licensed (from the diff it doesn't seem like it is, since I see a BSD 3 Clause)? Also say I submit a patch for this driver, does that mean this will have to be dual licensed also or can I choose if it is BSD 3 Clause or GPLv2?
