> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:55:34PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > The license is not an alternative. The alternative is between two > > > licenses. > > > > > > The moment one chooses one them... it's that one henceforth. > > > > And... you are a judge? > > Theo, be as unreasonable as you want.
I am not being unreasonable. You are not a judge, so stop acting like you are one. You don't know the full story. I do not know the full story either. But you are being a real prick on the lists here acting as if you have everything all figured out, you, the judge. > The copyright notice tells the user he can choose between two licenses. > If you choose the GNU GPL vs, you can't later on change to BSD or > proprietary for that would be a copyright violation. > > *Copyright notice != license* I am glad you are so sure, so confident. Are you placing money on the outcome? Many many other people are NOT SO SURE AT ALL. So leave it, ok?
