Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > morning. Indeed, I see that servers which had been whitelisted by > spamd were no longer so. I verified that spamlogd is still running. > Does anyone have any ideas how this could have happened?
Whitelist entries do expire after a while (a little more than a month by default, if I remember correctly, but it's a tuneable). That's a likely explanation, unless of course those servers have been sending you mail at shorter intervals. For known good (or important, infrequent, impatient, or a few other varieties we'll skip here for brevity) senders it pays to whitelist by hand using either spamdb or by setting up a way around spamdb such as having a no rdr rule for members of your <knowngood> table. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
