--- "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > { This is a resend. No replies after 24 hours }
>
> That could have been due to too little information.
>
> > Running OBSD 4.0 here.
> >
> > I was under the impression that spamd only did greylisting and
> dynamic
> > whitelisting. Static blacklisting available via spamd-setup (and
> > pseudo-whitelisting; of some of those blacklisted hosts).
>
> I had to go back and check, but 4.0 has greytrapping. Are you
> perhaps
> using that in your setup?
>
> > I occasionally get log messages like:
> >
> > spamd[12128]: (BLACK) 65.216.123.37: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Well, one obvious deficiency here is that you cut out the timestamp.
> If you're using either greytrapping or one of the more frequently
> updated downloadable blaclists (such as Beck's from UoA), it's quite
> possible that the address was in the blacklist at the time but its
> entry expired.
I _am_ using blacklists with spamd-setup and I _did_ check the
blacklisted hosts immediately after seeing the message. Perhaps my
command is messed up:
sudo pfctl -t spamd -T show | grep 65.216.123.37
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
