On 10/2/07, Eke Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/2/07, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/2/07, Eke Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/2/07, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:29:30PM -0500, Todd Alan Smith wrote: > > > > >On 10/1/07, Anton Karpov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> i have nothing to hide ;) > > > > > > > > >http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565 > > > > > > > > "Cool" link... Information about an article about privacy, and for > > > > downloading it you need javascript and whatever more... (I didn't > manage > > > > to get the full text). > > > > > > Not to mention no download unless registration. > > > > > > Sort of makes the whole excercise rather pointless (if the point > > > wasn't to laugh at gullible people). > > > > Yes, I thought that too, but then I just noticed the download links on > > the left. Here is a direct link to the one I downloaded--no javascript > > needed. Tell me if it works for you: > > > http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID998565_code249137.pdf?abstrac > tid=998565&mirid=1 > > It's flaky at best for me. Didn't work at all from the office, worked > once from home. I read the "download difficulties, click here" when > it didn't work at the office. That page states that download requires > registration and login, which apparently isn't exactly the truth. > > Whatever. Thanks for the support and clarifications, the paper seems > (after the most superficial skimming) well worth the effort to read. Now > returning to normal mode of silent, stumped lurking.
Indeed, it is well worth the read; downloading it requires neither registration nor the employment of JavaScript. (I, too, had difficulty determining how to download it when I first stumbled upon the page. Poor page design, perhaps. Anyway, I should have clued everybody in when I posted the link.)
