On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:26:53 -0500, "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:23 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, you wrote: >>On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:06 AM, "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jason Dixon wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having >>>>it *more secure* than not having it at all. >>>> >>>>Is that direct enough for you? >>>No, because it's wrong. >> >>You're full of shit. Period. > > I may be full of shit, but at least **I** don't post crap like this on a > public list.
Sure you do. You claim that the following statement is wrong, but you don't offer any explanation. That's crap. "There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having it *more secure* than not having it at all." Quit dodging like a troll. Explain yourself. -- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net -- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
