On 10/25/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Well, there is no solution. 16 was chosen a lot of years ago as a > > reasonable amount of state to carry around, and that's the standard > > and we're probably going to stick with it. > > What, then, is the correct way to separate the project files of more > than 16 projects, where some users will need access to all of the > groups?
read again: there is no solution.
