On Nov 6, 2007 2:12 PM, Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Juan Miscaro wrote: > > > --- Peter Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> was obsolete for a while, long enough that it was hard to > > >> get updates on the virus signatures. I was going to put > > >> up 4.2 expecting to get an updated version of clamav, but > > >> I discovered that 4.2 still uses 0.90.3. The virus signatures > > >> providers are expecting 0.91.2. > > >> > > >> Is there a newer version coming, or is there a better virus > > >> scanner to use? > > > > > > > > > I've been bothered by this for a long time. I'm going to try > > having > > > all my future clamav installations built by source. > > > > > > > Use OpenBSD snapshots or run -current. The port is updated there. > > > You recommend a production server to be running -current? > > Poll: who here is doing that? > > // juan > > > Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to > Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com > >
I don't have any 'production servers' but I have run -current (updated about once a week) on my laptop that I use daily for the last two years and I never had any problems with stability. I would consider it stable enough to run on production servers. br dunceor
