hmm, on Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:47:17PM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam said that > On 14:45:41 Dec 04, frantisek holop wrote: > > > +1 > > > > one man's worthless feature is other man's best friend. > > please put it in... > > No use shouting yourself hoarse over this.
shouting? are you serious? > If it is a no , it is a no. I later realized that nobody can satisfy > everyone's needs and it is impossible to ever get total buy in in > anything. We have to respect the developer's decisions. Henning has not used the word "no", yet. he might sleep on it and commit it tommorrow. or never, i dont know. but if people don't tell him that it can be useful, he'll never know, because it is useless to him. and when it comes up 4 years from now he'll say, "oh, it's trivial but noone told me it's useful." things like this happen all the time, decisions may change based on new info. and last but not least, it is in line with the other network tools (so i hope Henning will have a good night's sleep) and as an added bonus, patch was attached. -f ps. maybe some day some people on this list will stop defending the devs as if they couldn't speak for themselves (they can) or couldn't shout at those pesky lusers themselves (oh hell, they can). -- i plan to live forever or die trying.
