Hello! On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:58:16PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Since we don't currently support route priorities, I think that might > be the cleanest workaround. Another way is to add a static route (just > a /32 would do) to a host which you can connect from if there's a > problem, but that's much more of a hack.
Thanks for that idea. Probably I'll use this hack, I like it :) > look for a route for the destination and if it can't find one, stops > processing the packet with EHOSTUNREACH. Ah, I see now. Thank you for this explaination. -- WBR, Alexander Burnos
