On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 07:13:02AM +0200, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:48:16PM +1100, Sunnz wrote:
>
> > pass out on pppoe1 route-to (pppoe0 pppoe0:peer) \
> > from any to pppoe0
> I don't think that will work. Anyone trying to reach pppoe0 will not get
> routed out on pppoe1.
Hmm, actually that rule is almost correct, and I ended up getting confused...
What you probably mean is:
pass out on pppoe1 route-to (pppoe0 pppoe0:peer) from pppoe0 to any
^^^^^^^^
This avoids packets from pppoe0's address from being routed on pppoe1
(since your isp would drop them.)
You need a similar rule for your other pppoe interface.
--
Jussi Peltola
