Here are some details:


$ uname -a

OpenBSD fw-1.my.domain 4.2 GENERIC.MP#1 i386



Hoststated.conf:



ext_if="bge0"



web_1="10.1.1.10"

web_1_1="10.1.1.40"

web_2="10.1.1.11"

web_2_1="10.1.1.41"

virtual_web="public.IP.1"

virtual_web_1="public.IP.2"



interval 30

timeout 300



table http_table {

        check http "/" code 302

        real port 80

        host $web_1 retry 2

}



table https_table {

        check https "/" code 200

        real port 443

        host $web_1 retry 2

}



table https_table_1 {

        check https "/test-web_1.html" code 200

        real port 443

        host $web_1_1 retry 2

}



table backup_http_table {

        check http "/" code 302

        real port 80

        host $web_2 retry 2

}



table backup_https_table {

        check https "/" code 200

        real port 443

        host $web_2 retry 2

}



table backup_https_table_1 {

        check https "/test-web_1.html" code 200

        real port 443

        host $web_2_1 retry 2

}



service http_service {

        virtual host $virtual_web port 80 interface $ext_if

        table http_table

        backup table backup_http_table

}



service https_service {

        virtual host $virtual_web port 443 interface $ext_if

        table https_table

        backup table backup_https_table

}



service https_service_1 {

        virtual host $virtual_web_1 port 443 interface $ext_if

        table https_table_1

        backup table backup_https_table_1

}



Again, I have two boxes with exactly the same configuration running
CARP. And, as I stated before, that load balancing configuration runs
like for a week, then start seeing web_1 and web_1_1 down. Sometime, it
starts using web_2 and web_2_1, or sometimes sees them down, as well.
However, I never saw any stability problem with both web_1 and web_1_1.
So, when such a thing happens, I just reboot openBSD boxes without
touching anything on both web_1 and web_1_1. Then, all comes up fine (at
least for a week again).



Thanks for any help and suggestion!



Rami

Reply via email to