On 02/20/08 15:00, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
>>> But that >100 year old technology used to be DC earlier, then it was
>>>  converted to AC because of its inherent benefits.

Marketing blurb.

>> way over a hundred years ago, yes (except for some small irrelevant
>> isles like parts of new york if memory serves).
>
> Even new york stopped doing it last year.  There is no more DC current
> being served.

Well

http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9539765

> Put like this, a Europe-wide grid seems an obvious idea. That it has not
> yet been built is because AC power lines would lose too much power over
> such large distances. Hence the renewed interest in DC.
>
> Westinghouse won the battle of the currents in the 1880s because it is
> easier to transform the voltage of an AC current than of a DC current.

(Also debatable with switching power technologies we have now instead of the
classical bulkey 50/60Hz transformers, often the first thing we do these
days is making the AC DC...)

> High voltage is the best way to transmit power (the higher the voltage,
> the smaller the loss), but high voltage is not usually what the user
> wants. Power is therefore transmitted along high-tension AC lines and
> then stepped down to usable voltages in local sub-stations.
>
> Edison was right, however, to argue that DC is the best way to transmit
> electricity of any given voltage. That is because the shifting current of
> AC runs to earth more easily than DC does. To avoid this earthing, AC
> lines have to be built a long way from the groundand the higher the
> voltage, the farther away they need to be. At 400 kilovolts, a standard
> value for long-distance transmission, an alternating current 30 metres
> (100 feet) from the ground has a fortieth of the loss of a similar cable
> at ground level. But even at this height an overhead DC line will beat an
> AC line at distances more than 1,000km (600 miles), while ground-level DC
> will beat AC at distances as short as 30km.

+++chefren

Reply via email to