On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:40:28PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> >What is it about OpenBSD that I can't resist it?
> >
> >After the past long exchange about "our ultimate goal" and a lot of
> >people advising me to go over to Solaris 10, I did, I removed OpenBSD
> >from one of my machines and installed "Solaris Express Developers
> >Edition".
> >It was slick looking, very graphical with most of things you want to
> >do, had Java SE 5/6 preinstalled, and had everything thing that I was
> >expecting from OpenBSD.
> >
> >But yet, after 2 hours of fooling around, I came back to OpenBSD.
> >
> >For one thing, it took me almost 1.5 hours to install Solaris, compare
> >that to 30 minutes with OpenBSD, including 'packages', 'src' and
> >'ports'.
> >
> >The second thing was probably the knowledge that things are simple
> >with OpenBSD, none of the complicated layouts thing as with Solaris.
> >You could follow instructions from ancient books like "Practical Unix
> >and Internet Security - Second Edition" to the T.
> >
> >Given all that, inspite of all the hammering I've taken over my
> >comments, I'd prefer to stick with OpenBSD.
> >
> >Thanks to Theo and the core gang for delivering such a good, clean
> >operating environment.
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >~Mayuresh
> 
> yeah, I've been doing some things with Solaris for work, it's stunned
> me that an OS can take most of DVD...and still be missing what I would
> call absolute basics that OpenBSD has on an install that fits in half
> of a CD.  I know, deep down, Solaris is a very good OS, and inspires a
> lot of the work OpenBSD developers do, but man, it's got user interface
> "features" that were fixed in MS-DOS and CP/M decades ago, and What The
> Heck do you put on an entire DVD when it doesn't even have a C compiler
> or some very basic management tools...

Solaris does have gcc and all the gnu stuff in the default install, you
just have to add /usr/sfw/bin to your path ... and sometimes prefix some
commands with 'g'.

For instance 'ggrep -r ...' instead of 'grep -r ...' to search recursively
with gnu grep (a worthless feature imho).

Reply via email to