On 2008-05-04, Pieter Verberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > True, but is the name of the license, or the name + URL enough?
Anyone can then change the contents of the URL later on. For example: domain expires, evil scammers grab it and publish a new license at the same URL requiring payment for commercial use. Much safer for users if the license is supplied with the code... > Than you > could replace the whole ISC license with just the line like: > # This file is ISC-licensed. > > This would make one reason for using public domain less; It won't safe > lines in textfiles. If you were talking about the 300+ lines of GPL I'd understand wanting to reduce it. But 13 lines of ISC license - is that really a problem?
