ropers wrote: > 2008/5/21 ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> ... >>>> I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use 2 >>>> numbers, e.g. 2(21) or 232 (4,294,967,296). Can you understand what they >>>> are saying? >> >> I am really heartened to see how quickly everybody here has responded >> and pointed out the error and correction. >> >> I am less delighted that 3com, who I emailed about this probably over >> 2 years ago, and who said they were going to look into this, *still* >> haven't fixed their PDF. >> >> Maybe if everybody who responded to this thread were to email them as >> well, *maybe* that would help. > > Or we could just post some errata at > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Intro , where the PDF is liked. > Would the FAQ maintainers be in favour of this? If so, then I could > probably write a diff for http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html .
s/Or/And/ :) sometimes, the best thing one can do with a bug is document it, which may prompt people to say, "hey, that sucks!", and fix it. Another solution would be to find/write a replacement document/site. (HTML preferred over pdf). Show me a diff. I am not interested in the FAQ being a errata sheet for someone else's document, but an advisory that the typography is hosed would not be bad (a better resource would be..uh..better). Nick.
