On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 01:42:05PM +0200, Almir Karic wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As far as perl goes, it's about the only language that fit the
> > bill. The older pkg_* were totally impossible to maintain and
> > extend, and I needed a sensible script language that was in
> > base.
>
> at the risk of starting a flame war, considered python? beside not
> being in the base, any other downsides for this particular task?
That's a pretty big downside.
--
o--------------------------{ Will Maier }--------------------------o
| web:.......http://www.lfod.us/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
*---------------------[ BSD: Live Free or Die ]--------------------*
