Ivan Arsenyev wrote: > > Check out ral(4) and acx(4) man pages. Maybe bwi(4). > > It's better to know end user's point, to avoid different > bugs and problems. bwi(4) is badliest choice, as it's totally > based on reverse engineering.
If ever looked into sys/arch/macppc/conf/GENERIC you should notice there is not too much choice wrt tested wireless drivers. > > I already have bcm-based integrated card, and it's > loss when far from access point. So you suppose others will not? :) Alexey
