Thanks for reply.
Do you got it working Uwe ? I am still reading about ifstated ad ospfd.conf -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] Em nome de u...@o3si.de Enviada em: quarta-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2009 06:59 Para: misc@openbsd.org Assunto: Re: OpenBSD 4.4 load balance outgoing Am Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:57:59 +0000 (UTC) schrieb Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>: > On 2009-01-20, u...@o3si.de <u...@o3si.de> wrote: > > as the FAQ http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath states: > > > > "It's worth noting that if an interface used by a multipath route > > goes down (i.e., loses carrier), the kernel will still try to > > forward packets using the route that points to that interface. > > the FAQ refers to 4.4 (i.e. the last released version), but I'm pretty > sure this particular thing (link down resulting in blackhole) is not a > problem in -current. Oh, I hope this. The same behaviour I already noticed like Ricardo so I give -current a try. > you may still have a need for some other way to kill the route if the > link stays up but the nexthop is down, though. I'll prefer ifstated but relayd for monitoring may bee a solution too. > > So use ifstated to check the link of the interface and populate the > > routing table accordingly. > > as an alternative to ifstated, you could take default routes from OSPF > if your environment allows. (ospfd is ECMP capable). > Thanks @Claudio and @Stuart for Your advice! Regards Uwe
