2009/2/25 patrick keshishian <pkesh...@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
> <hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/2/23 Jason Dixon <ja...@dixongroup.net>:
>>> ##########################################################
>>> 00 ext_if = "sk0"
>>> 01 int_if = "sk1"
>>> 02
>>> 03 set skip on lo
>>> 04
>>> 05 scrub in
>>> 06
>>> 07 nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if:0)
>>> 08
>>> 09 block in log all
>>> 10 pass in on $int_if inet keep state
>
> # I think you are missing a pass out on $ext_if rule
> 11 pass out on $ext_if
>
> w/o 11 all inbound packets are blocked by 09.
>
> --patrick

Please correct me it I'm wrong, but my understanding is that Jason's
line 09 is only blocking packets that traverse interfaces in the
*inward* direction (i.e. from the attached networks (WAN and LAN)
*in*to the OpenBSD box). And I think that's why a "pass out" rule
would be unnecessary, as the default is to pass packets. Again, take
this with truckloads of salt; I could be wrong, but I trust Jason.

The things David and Jean-Francois wrote below strike me as much more
promising and useful for of figuring out why Hilco didn't have success
with Jason's ruleset.

regards,
--ropers

Reply via email to