-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stuart Henderson asked:

how does one increase efficiency and reduce IT costs by making things
more complicated?

And Marc Balmer adds:

And, quite obviously, reduce stability and after all security.

Apologies if this is wandering too far off topic.

The opposition to virtualization technology in some quarters here is curious, though understandable and perhaps laudable among developers and users of an environment for which stability is paramount. I won't go as far as to say some of you live under a rock, but I will call it curious. :)

An informed enterprise sysadmin would probably agree that simplicity, security, and stability are factors, not goals in themselves, in a business decision. They are simply costs to be accounted for. On a large scale, virtual environments have quite compelling advantages in flexibility, resource utilization, and disaster recovery/business resumption, not to mention datacenter overhead cost. These all boil down to dollars/pounds/euros/yen, sometimes lots of them.

For hobbyists, of course, a virtual desktop means risk-free experimentation with other environments, which should makes us all happy and might introduce <insert favorite OS here> to a broader audience. Whereas VMWare was the only game in town for awhile on x86, the proliferation of virtualization support in x86 hardware has brought a whole new world of options and possibilities to home users on a budget.

In either case, if a virtual environment is the best or only way to attain a desired result within a given budget, then choosing the most robust guest environment to run within it should also be laudable. OpenBSD can certainly be a compelling choice, though it can be convincingly argued that its unique strengths might be diluted somewhat in that environment.

It is a certainty that virtualization is not only here to stay, but will become increasingly prevalent.

- --
David Talkington
[email protected]
- --
PGP key: http://www.flyingjoke.org/keys/801E3976.asc
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJwlmSAAoJEO7jL1CAHjl2L6AH/A7ogt2LtAp4Zp8yN4OjPDcz
eup5ITWUXBwdqbxnw8o3d8uHRC4UsHZzQbHLYQzdERsameUgW4QsdOhvd3ahkaAQ
TBZ+tgF1rJi65mYOV0N//J0GftJFmSVw5iTLXcKEVn7pF8KYVO/770Br0ev2OpJi
2pY5lknHNzFbO0JcgdF8asi7V9v8DXG2Sq49Y8dyQ9w31d006azEnu5bQEhBSp8h
Uads5P7+xJhAE8ieRxqg4U2XqoO5qUwU2FMa64PMWs2s5pHuvHR7DQTKdsZ8/DgL
udjefMdbOABYuoNAvOg5eqYY7P1sjS+u6kyx3uhYlwaMLGPfvNvxOckJkg+x/cY=
=RcI+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to