* J.C. Roberts <list-...@designtools.org> [2009-03-21 09:54]:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:16:32 +0100 Henning Brauer
> <lists-open...@bsws.de> wrote:
> 
> > * J.C. Roberts <list-...@designtools.org> [2009-03-10 02:03]:
> > > The "smart" answer for an ISP is moving to IPv6
> > 
> > that is about the least smart thing anybody could do.
> If everyone continues to avoid IPv6, then it will remain less than
> useful. I understand IPv6 has less than 1% uptake at the moment, but I
> don't understand why employing it (in addition to IPv4 NATing hacks) is
> "about the least smart" thing an ISP could do?
> 
> Is it a cost issue?

no, a lack of brain issue. v6 is broken by design in a thousand ways
and way worse than you can imagine. of course it has been detailed
here numerous times.

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

Reply via email to