On 2009/05/08 14:20, Alexander Shikoff wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:35:35AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff <minot...@crete.org.ua> wrote: > > > I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg: > > > com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > > > > But if I understand correctly they are named as cua0[0..1]. > > > > > >> PCI serial cards typically attach as puc(4), meaning com(4) devices > > >> should appear.. or pccom(4).. if you're using a release <= OpenBSD > > >> 4.3. > > > Yes, they appear in dmesg: > > > puc0 at pci1 dev 10 function 0 "Digi Neo-8" rev 0x05: ports: 8 com > > > com3 at puc0 port 0 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com4 at puc0 port 1 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com5 at puc0 port 2 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com6 at puc0 port 3 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com7 at puc0 port 4 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com8 at puc0 port 5 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com9 at puc0 port 6 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > com10 at puc0 port 7 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > > > > > I guess they are mapped to cuac0..cuac7? > > > > the letter after cua depends on the port type; we use cuac# for cy(4), > Well, I have no any cy-like card. Why I'm getting cuac# devices in /dev ?
> > cuaU# for USB serial ports, cua## for ns16x50-like devices. think those > > are the only choices for serial ports at the moment. > > > > for your puc(4) look at cua03..cua10 (dial-out devices) or tty03..tty10 > > (terminal devices; see "man 4 tty" for the difference between cua/tty). > There are no tty04..tty10 devices in /dev > There are only tty00..tty03. we don't have devfs, our devices nodes are static. use MAKEDEV or mknod to give you more.
