On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Robson Caetano <[email protected]> wrote:
> One could in most cases safely uncomment the rules
> and things would work.
>
> The new pf.conf can not be uncommented because it mentions
> a macro ($proxy) that has not been defined.
>
> Moreover, it has no nat rule except for the proxies (relay,
> ftp, spamd, etc.). And it suggests no safe filtering policy.

I don't think the sample was ever intended to be used as a uncomment
and go default.  pf isn't like X, where a default of working is
sufficient.  If you have to think about what you're doing, I'd say
that's an improvement.

Reply via email to