On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:13 AM, stan<st...@panix.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:57:24PM +1000, Aaron Mason wrote: >> Wouldn't fsck create the lost+found directory if it's missing? e2fsck >> in Linux does, so if that's based on Unix's fsck, it's possible. > > Olderversions of fsck are very careful to make as few changes as possible > to an already fragile (damage) filesystem.
If you don't believe him, perhaps you should do something bizzare and unnatural like, say, read the fsck_ffs(8) manpage. Philip Guenther
