On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 03:33:07PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:59:45PM -0700, 4625 wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:08:55PM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I think your problem can be traced to the different default
> > > > > > > > > voices.
> > > > > > > > I've test timidity with a different sound fonts and with the
> > > > > > > > same config, like I have one in FreeBSD, on the same PC.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I wonder if FreeBSD's patch-playmidi would make any difference.
> > > > > > It is not port or patch problem, but perfomance (on my opinion).
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > maybe you don't.  but for me, multichannel audio is more important
> > > > > > > for a desktop than some busted old software midi player.
> > > > 
> > > > It would be nice to hope that there is exist good substitute for 
> > > > timidity,
> > > > which able to produce sound with the same quality.
> > > 
> > > did you try that timidity patch from freebsd I refered you to?
> > Sure.
> > 
> > > > > > > > But I'm sure, I should boot
> > > > > > > > FreeBSD-4.11 to listen midi files.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > or you could use a less ancient midi player.
> > > > > > Could you advice me one?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I like fluidsynth.
> > > > Well, I got it. Could you explain me how do you ran it?
> > > 
> > > the way the manual says to.
> > What make you think that I did not saw the manual?
> > 
> 
> IMHO this discussion is taking the wrong direction.
> 
> I use MIDI a lot, exclusively on OpenBSD; both for playback,
> recording, editting and basic real-time "filtering".
> 
> Feel free to ask for hints and to explain what you try to do
> with MIDI and -- most importantly -- with what MIDI hardware.
> Either privately or on the list, if you feel there's
> something others should know.
> 
> To quickly summarize where OpenBSD is:
> 
>  - harware synths, keyboards, control surfaces etc...  just
>    work, and are fully usable for real-time stuff since few years.
>    After all MIDI is a dumb serial port.
> 
>  - opl(4), pcppi(4) are almost useless and seem
>    unmaintained, I have plans to work on them (or anything
>    based on src/sys/dev/midisyn.h).

of course, I have absolutely _no_ plans to work on them...
...other than possibly removing them if one day they block
development.

sorry for the typo.

-- Alexandre

Reply via email to