On 11/21/09, Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Mihai Popescu B.S. <mihai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > ... >> Since some time, the x*.tgz are reported as FAILED in this check. I >> send another email to the list, I got one answer but I'm not able yet >> to get the idea. So, I ask again, is still this SHA256 used for _all_ >> files or it is just for non x* files in snapshots? Should I use it to >> check the files snaphots or not? > > Did you examine the timestamps on the SHA256 and x* files? What were > they? What mirror was this from? > > Looking at ftp.openbsd.org just now, the SHA256 file for the i386 > snapshots has the correct value for all the x*.tgz files. > > > Philip Guenther >
I did and I got an idea about what may happen: I had in my mind that .iso file is just an image of the files present in the directory, which is not true all the time. Now I think the developers are not building an .iso file for wach change they do in the directory. This way, inside .iso file can be older .tgz files than what I see in the fto directory. This explains why checks are FAILED. Am I right ? Thanks
