On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 01:00:50 +0000 Quentin Merton <quentin.mer...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Has the NAT rule syntax changed in 4.6 current from 3-dec? - > (GENERIC.MP) #340 > > I dont see any change in the webpages: > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html > > A rule that worked in 4.6 release: > nat pass on $ext_if proto tcp from 192.168.0.2 to any port 80 -> > $ext_if_IP > > now generates an error: > pf.conf:247: syntax error > I had a look at the pf documentation and it now mentions nat-to > rather than nat but perhaps I am misreading. > > A pointer would be much appreciated. > > Quentin uhm, yeah, looong time ago: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20090901 for those using snapshots/-current that page is kind of mandatory if one doesn't follow the nice commit messages on source-chan...@. (or misc@ for that matter in this case.) - Robert
