* Ingo Schwarze (schwa...@usta.de) wrote: > situation, so i consider tedu@'s question unanswered. I'm not even sure > there is a good solution at all: Jan Stary and Jonathan Thornburg have > presented strong arguments indicating that "run it manually at the time > you want it" might be the best answer.
What about a new script that runs daily/weekly/monthly as needed to make it a bit simpler. The user would then not have to keep track of which script to run. This script could be called manually or the user could ad it in cron or shutdown script as it suits the user/machine. ..just my $.02 /jkm
