On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marco Peereboom <[email protected]> wrote: > OpenBSD apache 1.3 != apache 1.3 > > What is wrong with apache in base? > > And if you don't like it what is wrong with apache 2 in ports? > > Or any other web server in ports for that matter. > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:21:03PM -0800, David wrote: >> Given the above, is openbsd going to stick with Apache 1.3? > >
My question after reading the news was: Will OpenBSD update its in-base Apache to 1.3.42, or will it stick with 1.3.29? If not I'd like to know why. I can understand the licensing issue of upgrading to Apache 2, the fact that updating an in-base program such as Apache which, AFAIK, has had some improvements from the OpenBSD people, might be time consuming, and the fact that maybe Apache 1.3.29 it's just good enough. But I'd like to know which one of these theories is correct, I'm just curious. Greetings.
