* Pete Vickers <[email protected]> [2010-03-01 12:28]:
> okay, sounds reasonable. I've also 'fiddled with other knobs' too, so I hope
> my kern.maxclusters at 8192 should not cause exhaustion conjunction with:
> 
> 
> net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen=512
> net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144
> kern.maxfiles=8192
> kern.maxclusters=8192
> 
> 
> BTW, when the system runs out of (these?) resources, it sometimes prevents SSH
> access or squid use, but still keeps a CARP peering alive, preventing failover
> to it's backup partner, which is somewhat frustrating (I know I could script
> around this).

this is perfectly sane and the intended bahaviour. no mbufs / clusters
available -> packet dropped.

> On other occasions, it drops into ddb> , which at least allows
> the CARP backup to take over duties. (I know I should file a bug report for
> this)

yes, in an idea world that doesn't happen and the system copes with
the ressource shortage.

-- 
Henning Brauer, [email protected], [email protected]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting

Reply via email to