Marco Peereboom wrote:
Oh hai!
Marco does it for the lulz.
You know you don't have to read what I write you know. If it irritates
you that is your problem, not mine. Feel free to ignore this.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom <[email protected]> wrote:
oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom <[email protected]> wrote:
Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored.
webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like
http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-30000,0
I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).
I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
behavior is okay . . .?
Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
apparent need/desire to top post.
Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
now on? misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is . . . well . . .
annoying (to say the least).
--
- RSM
www.erratic.ca
