> > rude to the casual users." Maybe that is why OpenBSD is so far down > > the list at http://bsdstats.org/ . > > For whatever reason the bsdstats initiative never gained much > popularity in OpenBSD circles, but it's really easy to start dropping > data into the pool there if you want to. As far as I can tell my > notes from way back (http://www.bsdly.net/~peter/bsdstat/) still apply.
The data in it has no quality. Around 3 months after starting it, the author deleted all the records except the FreeBSD ones. That made it more than clear that the author has no quality. He should get a job with the IPCC.
