> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:41:35 -0600 > Ted Roby <ted.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I didn't think OpenBSD was even interested in such licensing > > schemes in the Ports tree. > > > > There's non-free software in the ports tree.
Not in a real sense. The ports tree is a build infrastructure containing Makefiles, lists of files and where they should go, and (in a perfect world, continously shrinking) minimal patches. It does not contain source, per se. There are small code snippets which are _patches_, but the patches are largely of no great consequences. They exist to adapt foreign software to our interfaces, and the idea is that those patches should eventually be fed upsteam, or become unneccesary.
